SYNOPSIS
MY THOUGHTS
The writing left a lot to be desired, in my opinion. This book was right up my alley, but de Courcy somehow made everything fall flat. She didn't bring anyone to life in this book. I've read a lot of history books that, even if they're about a pretty lame topic, the writing brings it to life and makes me want to keep reading.
An example: Consuelo Vanderbilt was pretty much on house arrest because her mother, Alva, wanted her to marry the Duke of Marlborough even though she was in love with someone else. Alva made sure Consuelo married the Duke by any means necessary. How could something that extreme only serve as a one-liner in this book? "This was an extreme case of husband hunting" (I'm paraphrasing, but that's the gist of it.)
De Courcy focused more on the courting methods of husbands and what was going on around that time, versus the actual women and what happens after the "happily ever after." What a shame.
No comments:
Post a Comment